Undeniable Proof That The Bible Is True And God Exists!!

Undeniable Proof That The Bible Is True And God Exists!!

Undeniable Proof That The Bible Is True And God Exists!! (You can translate the captions into your own language) Everything that begins to exist has a cause. We know from science that our…



Planet Zion says:

Hi Tommy, thank you for your comment, for some odd reason replies to your
comment was disabled, so I will try to respond to your claims and arguments
the best that I can here:

*You guys are all brainwashed.*

Well, if you read all of my rebuttals to all of your arguments here, from
my perspective I would suppose that you might be the one who is
brainwashed. Those who are brainwashed tend to regurgitate false claims
especially the so-called “Bible errors” which have already been debunked by
many Christians and Jews so long ago.

*You know what also has much more undeniable evidence besides scripture
from unknown origins?*
*1. Evolution*
*2. The Big Bang*
*3. abiogenesis*

There is undeniable evidence for Evolution, the Big bang and Abiogenesis?
First of all Evolution, the Big Bang and Abiogenesis are not science – they
are all historical sciences which attempt to answer our origins. Do you
know what science is? Science is built upon tests that are repeatable,
testable and more importantly observable. Can we confidently observe
Evolution in the past? No, but we can observe the adaptations or
micro-evolution that we see in the present. Evolution proposes that
macro-evolution (or micro-evolution over vast periods of time) is capable
of changing a monkey into a human being – this is a logical fallacy, which
is called the Division Fallacy. Division Fallacy is where someone assumes
that if part of the whole is true, then the entire whole is assumed true,
micro-evolution is true but it does not necessarily mean that the entire
Evolution Theory which includes the idea of macro-evolution is true. Do you
understand what I mean? On the contrary, there are a lot of problems in the
Evolution Theory that scientist avoid speaking about – genetic entropy,
orphan genes, the Cambrian explosion, stasis of the fossils, Berea fossil
human footprints, artifacts with both dinosaur and human images on them
like the Ica Stones, dinosaurs being found in the guts of mammals and many

Genetic entropy tells us that genes cannot survive for millions and
millions of years – this fact limits organisms to only emerging recently
within a few thousands years, however, the anti-creationists tend to
believe otherwise and thus violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Orphan
genes are genes which are completely unique to every living organism and
not found in supposed relatives in the evolutionary chain. Orphan genes
defy Evolution, because genes are passed down from ancestors according to
the Evolution theory, however, orphan genes did not seem to evolve at all
as they have no intermediary genes to suggest evolution of the gene, thus
suggesting that these organisms had these genes appear instantly contrary
to the gradual change over time that Evolution proposes. The Cambrian
Explosion suggests that animals, even those living today have all emerged
almost instantly almost exactly as the Bible suggests. Stasis of the
fossils or the lack of changes in fossils in the Cambrian is another
serious problem for the theory. Evolution is change over time, however, the
Cambrian explosion features many animals that we know today – in defiance
of what Evolution teaches – change over time. The Berea tracks have human
footprints in the Carboniferous period, which was the period of time where
anti-creationists claim that there were only amphibians around and reptiles
were just beginning to emerge – no birds or mammals had evolved yet. The
“Ica stones” feature dinosaurs living with human beings – people thought
that these were hoaxes until scientists found dinosaur skin with the same
sort of spotted patterns found on the Ica stone depictions of dinosaurs –
thus proving that they are authentic. Finally, the discovery of a dinosaur
within the stomach of an unusually large mammal only makes matters worse as
the Evolution theory teaches that this should not be – that mammals were
very small during the dinosaur age:


The Evolution Theory is riddled with many problems and that is just the tip
of the iceberg.

We know the Big Bang happened partly due to the red-shift phenomena, which
tells us that the universe is expanding. But the truth is that Christians
knew this long before the scientists did – the only debate Creationists
tend to have with the Big Bang Theory is WHEN and HOW it happened:

Jeremiah 10:12
He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his
wisdom, and *hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion.*

Unaided Abiogenesis or Abiogenesis by natural processes is completely
unproven. Scientists may have created RNA in labs, but that is not
impressive at all. Scientists and engineers manufacture organic compounds
on a daily basis around the world. This fact only confirms that it takes an
intelligence to carry out Abiogenesis. The Bible talks about Abiogenesis,
but it was carried out by God Himself:

Genesis 2:7
And *the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into
his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.*

Most people do not know that Abiogenesis was actually debunked by Louis
Pasteur, who debunked the idea of Spontaneous Generation and other
incarnations of the same theory that life can arise from matter (Louis
Pasteur was also a creationist by the way). Don’t believe me? This is what
he had to say – pay attention to how he defines Spontaneous Generation:

*“This is the question of what we call ‘spontaneous generation.’ Mightn’t
matter, perhaps, organize itself? Or posed differently, mightn’t creatures
enter the world without parents, without forebears? This is the question I
seek to resolve.”* – Louis Pasteur (1822-1895), in “On Spontaneous
Generation,” 1864, from Revue des cours scientifics (1864) vol. 1: 257-264
Trans. (1993) by Alex Levine.

So, it would seem that Louis set out to debunk both Abiogenesis and
Spontaneous Generation and he had succeeded. People who claim to create
life in the lab are only debunking the idea that it can be done in nature –
they are unwittingly proving that it requires vast amounts of fine-tuning,
and intelligence to create life, which is what the Bible has been saying
all along. I am compiling an ever-growing playlist filled with videos
demonstrating that Science and the Bible are completely compatible with
each other. They answer and expose many of the flaws of Evolution, Big Bang
Theory and Abiogenesis, feel free to view it here and weigh the evidence

*1) Flat Earth?*

No, the Bible never teaches a flat Earth. The Bible states that the Earth
has a spherical nature to it:

Revelation 9:2
And *he opened the BOTTOMLESS PIT;* and there arose a smoke out of the pit,
as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by
reason of the smoke of the pit.

The Bible tells us that the Earth has a “bottomless pit.” What is a
bottomless pit? In geometry, a “bottomless pit” is a term synonymous to
“the center of a sphere.” From a sphere’s center all directions are up and
hence theoretically fits the description of a bottomless pit. As such, we
see that the Bible indirectly confirms that the Earth has a spherical
nature.Of course, the Bible has other proofs that the Earth is not flat.
The Bible tells us that it is round and circular – both of which avoids
making the mistake of directly stating that the Earth is perfectly

Isaiah 40;22
It is *he that sitteth upon the CIRCLE of the earth,* and the inhabitants
thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain,
and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in.

The Bible describes the Earth as a “circle,” we all of course know that the
Earth is slightly spherical (an oblate spheroid) but there was no Hebrew
word for “spherical” or “sphere.” The Hebrew word for “circle” used here is
transliterated as “chuwg.” The Bible, while limited by vocabulary, still
successfully showed that the Earth is slightly spherical and I will explain
how: Because the Bible refutes the “flat circle” idea when one considers
what it tells us in Job 26:10:

Job 26;10
*He hath compassed the waters with bounds, until the day and night come to
an end.*

The above verse clearly describes what we know as “Terminators” in
Astronomy, which are twilight zones which separates the day side and night
side of planets. The Bible tells us that the Earth is suspended in space by
nothing – analogous to other round heavenly bodies like our Sun, stars and

Job 26:7
He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, *and hangeth the earth
upon nothing.*

Also the Proverbs tells us that the Earth is round:

Proverbs 8:27
When he prepared the heavens, I was there: when *He set a compass upon the
face of the depth:*

To “set a compass” means to inscribe a circle – the Earth’s surface is
mostly water – once again the Bible is suggesting that the Earth is round.
Even Jesus hinted to us that the Earth is in fact round:

Luke 17:31, 34-36
*In that day,* he which shall be upon the housetop, and his stuff in the
house, let him not come down to take it away: and he that is in the field,
let him likewise not return back.
I tell you, *in that night* there shall be two men in one bed; the one
shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other
Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

The events of Luke 17:31 and Luke 17:34 occurs simultaneously according to
Jesus Christ. How can it be day and night at the same time on a flat Earth?
Common sense, tells us that Jesus, the Son of God, knew exactly what He was
saying – He was referring to an event that would impact people on other
parts of our round planet. As such these verses together confirms that the
Earth is round and circular in nature, all via various methods which avoids
the mistake of saying that it is perfectly spherical.

*2) Geocentric Solar System Model?*

Don’t make me laugh. The Bible says no such thing. People who reuse this
claim tend to be referring to this scripture here:

Psalms 19:6
*His (the sun’s) going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit
unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof.*

A lot of non-believers get excited and erroneously believe that this
passage speaks about the sun moving around the Earth, when this verse says
no such thing. This motion of the sun is not relative to the Earth in the
above verse but rather the motion is relative to “heaven” which we commonly
refer to as space. I hope that you recognize this subtle difference.
Science have proven now that our sun has an orbit in space and is not
stationary which is a very common misconception. The sun travels at about
600,000 miles per hour within a “circuit” exactly as described in the
Bible. It was Thomas Wright in 1750 who first suggested that the sun has
an orbit which was further elaborated by Immanuel Kant in 1755. This fact
was known to Bible believers almost 3000 years ago.

*3) Mustard Seeds are the smallest seeds?*

Wrong again, Tommy:

Matthew 13:31, 32
Another parable put he forth unto them, saying, *The kingdom of heaven is
like to a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field:*
*Which indeed is the least of all seeds:* but when it is grown, it is the
greatest among herbs, and becometh a tree, so that the birds of the air
come and lodge in the branches thereof.

Jesus was never saying that the mustard seed was the smallest seed in the
entire planet, this is another misunderstanding. It is the smallest seed
that a farmer in the Israeli region “sowed in his field” as verse 31 puts
it. The common mustard seed in Israel, the Black Mustard also called
“Brassica nigra,” can grow surprisingly tall over 12 feet and can therefore
easily hold a bird’s nest. The vast majority of these “bible errors” are
easily dismissed when you understand the context of the passage.

*4) Evolution is Untrue?*

Now you are being deceitful. Macro-evolution, which is unobserved and hence
not science is a belief – you have to BELIEVE it. Micro-evolution or
adaptation, which has been observed is in fact science – no Creationist
would ever tell you that adaptations or micro-evolution is untrue – it is a
well-established fact that both the anti-creationists and creationists
agree with.

*5) Bats Are birds; Not Mammals?*

Tommy, the Bible never says that bats are birds, you are once again

Leviticus 11:13-19
And *these are they which ye shall have in abomination among the fowls;
they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination:* the eagle, and the
ossifrage, and the ospray,
And the vulture, and the kite after his kind;
Every raven after his kind;
And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his
And the little owl, and the cormorant, and the great owl,
And the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle,
And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, *and the bat.*

On the surface, I would understand why you would think the Bible says this,
but this idea is easily refuted when one takes the time to study the Hebrew
word used for “fowl” used in Leviticus 11:13. The Hebrew word here for
“fowl” is “`owph” according to Strong’s Concordance H5775:


The word for “`owph” can mean “flying creature,” “fowl,” “insects,” and
“birds.” I am sure that you are an intelligent man, in light of the context
the word that should have been used by the English translators should have
been “flying creature.” This issue only occurs in the English translation,
the original Hebrew text has no problems – this is not a scientific error –
the Hebrew word is referring to all those animals vaguely as “flying

*6) A High Mountain Can See Every Kingdom of the World?*

This is once again another error those who despise the Bible tend to make.
But before I debunk this claim as well I need to go through some scriptures
with you Tom:

Matthew 4:1, 2, 8, 9
Then was *Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of
the devil.*
And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he was afterward an
Again, *the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and
sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;*
And saith unto him, *All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall
down and worship me.*

I am sure that you are a reasonable individual, Tommy, Jesus was being
tempted by Satan, the Devil – this encounter was a supernatural encounter;
not a normal encounter. Would it be fair for anyone of us to look for
scientific facts or errors within a supernatural encounter like meeting
Satan? Of course not. Satan was trying to tempt Jesus into worshiping
himself, by showing Jesus all these kingdoms. Remember this is a
supernatural event because the scripture says clearly that Satan “sheweth
him all the kingdoms of the world” at once! Satan was perhaps allowed to
give Jesus a vision of all these nations by some supernatural means, hence,
this is no problem. Why did Satan need to take Jesus up the mountain? Satan
was going to crown Jesus king of all the nations if He accepted his offer
and in Jewish traditions kings are coronated upon the top of mountains.
Mount Zion is one of the mountains that the Jewish Kings were crowned (see
Psalms 2:6; 2 Samuel 5:7). Also consider the progression of the temptation
by Satan in Matthew chapter 4, the first temptation was in the desert, the
second was on the top of the temple while the third was on top the mountain
– there is a progression in height here, proportional to the extent of the

*7) No evidence for knowledge of the Americas?*

I find this a very strange argument to make against the Bible. This
confuses me, because it was Christianity that played the role in the
discovering of the Americas, last time I checked Christopher Columbus was a
Christian, those who funded his expedition were also Christians. In fact,
contrary to what you believe there is evidence that Christopher Columbus
was inspired by Second Book of Esdras (in the Apocrypha) to discover the
New World:


Besides, it seems to me that you have never heard about the “Los Lunas”
stone. It is a stone that was uncovered in New Mexico, which had the ten
commandments written in ancient Hebrew and seems to suggest that the Jews
who possessed the Christian Old Testament, called the Tanakh, were probably
already in the Americas as far back as 3000 years ago:


There are also prophetic references to America in the Bible and I encourage
you to research more into them – some of them are very interesting:


Isaiah 49:1
*Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath
called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention
of my name.*

In fact, I have heard of some Bible scholars who argue that Isaiah 49:1, is
a prophetic warning by God to the Americas described as “O isles” and “ye
people, from far” to reject Abortion – a warning which is sadly not being

*Not to mention the horrible historic events, including:*
*1. Crusades*
*2. Inquisition*

Crusades? Inquisition? Come on Tommy, get your facts right – it was SOME of
those who belonged to the Roman Catholic Church who committed those
atrocities; NOT ALL of Christianity. Do you know that many Bible believing
Christians were killed in the Inquisition? Do you know that the Crusades
was mostly a defensive war, done to prevent Muslims from slaughtering the
innocent Christians who simply wanted to visit the Holy Land? Do you know
that the Crusades were done to prevent Islam from overrunning Europe? Some
historians would argue that if there were no Crusades there would be no
America as we see today!! The Muslims would have taken over Europe and may
have traveled to the Americas and made the west completely Islamic:

This argument you are making is deeply flawed and I will explain why with
an example. Just a few days ago, an Atheist, murdered three Muslims:


Would it be fair for me to now call ALL Atheists evil? No, it would not.
The sins of that one Atheist should not be placed upon all Atheists on the
planet. So, in like manner it is grossly unfair when people like yourself
use this same illogical argument to try to attack Christianity as a whole
based on the misguided actions of the few. But if you want to persist in
playing that game, then think about the over 1 billion babies that have
been slaughtered in Abortions. There is no Bible scripture used to support
Abortion – the Bible is strongly against Abortion – people tend to lean on
Atheistic and Evolutionary thinking along with materialistic philosophy to
support Abortions. Those same evolutionary philosophies are used in
Communism and Socialism which have led to the deaths of countless millions.
Karl Marx who founded Marxism (which is the basis for communism) was deeply
influenced by Charles Darwin:


In any case, I don’t know what to really make of this particular argument
of yours – you almost sound like President Obama here:

*Lastly, on that “deception” verse…. the evolution picture was so false
and if you believe that is the definition of evolution (a cow turning into
a human) you are mentally insane and should probably grab a biology

That picture was just a joke, you are overreacting. Is it wrong to poke fun
at something like a theory? Creationists try to show respect to people
unlike the anti-creationists who use foul language and Ad hominem attacks
and you are a perfect example of the typical anti-creationist, because you
are calling TigerDan925 “mentally insane” and thus unwittingly fulfilling
point #9 of this video here at 8:15. That picture mocked the theory – no
harm was done. You have very little to offer if you have to resort to such
immature attacks.

*Christians: WARNING! If you decide to reply to this comment I need cold
hard evidence that refutes the theories I accept and supports your’s. No
scripture allowed: the unknown origins of the Bible kills its validity.*

Finally, you make a massive logical fallacy. You argued so-called “errors”
in the Bible but refuse the idea of anyone using the very same Bible to
discredit those “errors.” That just reeks of hypocrisy, Tommy. You tried to
used the Bible to attack the Bible, yet you refuse to accept solutions from
the Bible to debunk those same attacks. My response is completely
acceptable, it is only fair that I use the very same Bible to answer your
misconceptions of what it teaches. You would probably believe it is
circular reasoning, but it really isn’t. For example, if you were to make
incorrect scientific claims, then I need to use sound scientific claims to
counter your false claims, if you made false historical claims, then I
would need to counter those with solid historical facts. As such when you
use erroneous biblical interpretations to attack the Bible, then it
naturally would follow that I must use sound biblical interpretations to
counter your inaccuracies in biblical interpretation. Unknown origins of
the Bible? We know exactly who wrote the books, when they wrote it and have
thousands of manuscripts verifying its authenticity – no other holy text
can brag in this way:



I hope that this comment answered your questions. God bless.

Tommy DeLuca says:

You guys are all brainwashed.

You know what also has much more undeniable evidence besides scripture from
unknown origins?
1. Evolution
2. The Big Bang
3. abiogenesis

You know what the Bible also says about science?
1. a flat Earth
2. geocentric solar system model
3. mustard seeds are the very smallest seeds
4. evolution is untrue although much evidence contradicts this
anti-evolutionary hypothesis
5. bats are birds; not mammals?
6. a high mountain can see every “kingdom” of the World
7. no evidence for knowledge of the Americas; if the Bible is accurate they
would have
and spread the knowledge of the Americas for colonization before
Christopher Columbus.

Not to mention the horrible historic events, including:
1. Crusades
2. Inquisition

Lastly, on that “deception” verse…. the evolution picture was *so false*
and if you believe that is the definition of evolution (a cow turning into
a human) you are mentally insane and should probably grab a biology

Christians: WARNING! If you decide to reply to this comment I need cold
hard evidence that refutes the theories I accept and supports your’s. No
scripture allowed: the unknown origins of the Bible kills its validity.

Monstermack40 says:

@ Tommy Deluca, You got it wrong pal, youre the one who is brainwashed.
1.evilution is a lie from hell, no proof of it,have you seen it firsthand?
Or do you have faith in the people who told you about it?
2. Big bang is a delusion as well. Chaos cannot create order, nothing
cannot create everything.
3.another myth

1.Isaiah 40:22 say’s the earth is round,even Columbus knew this.

Calvin L Mockbee says:

Undeniable Proof That The Bible Is True And God Exists!!

25 fulfilled Bible prophecies

Wagner Paiva CCB says:

Great video!

Planet Zion says:

Do you believe that the #Bible is false? Here is proof that the Bible is
true and that #God exists. #Mustsee

herbielina says:

Check out this video on YouTube:

David Belovd says:
PcMiner51 says:

I beloeve in god but I sometimes need something to reassure me that he is
still there, kind of hard to explain but this video is amazing

Calvin L Mockbee says:

Undeniable Proof That The Bible Is True And God Exists!!

25 fulfilled Bible prophecies

King Matthew V says:


† Praise 7 Ye 7 AHAYAH 7 † says:
Lee UK says:

Great to see someone from the UK posting quality christian video’s. keep up
the good work. 

oscar jacobs says:

Undeniable Proof That The Bible Is True And God Exists!!:

Comments are disabled for this post.